Why risk scores exist in the first place
Manual due diligence does not scale well when teams need to screen many assets, refresh views often, or respond quickly. A score creates a shared starting point so teams can prioritize where to spend attention.
Where automation creates the most leverage
Automation is most valuable when the team needs consistent first-pass screening, fast comparison across assets, and durable monitoring against the same criteria over time.
- Ranking candidates before deeper review.
- Flagging meaningful score drift after an initial approval.
- Giving commercial and operations teams a readable summary before escalation.
Where manual review still matters
A score cannot fully evaluate judgment-sensitive topics such as team credibility, venue-specific operational risk, or the intent behind wallet behavior.